An add-on that gives Ludwig a second profession: assistant to your organisation's data protection officer. Ask whether a document can be disclosed, what the legal basis for a processing activity is, or how a data subject request should be handled — Ludwig answers grounded in a built-in legal reference corpus, not in model memory, and names the act, the provision, and the consolidated version behind every legal statement.
- Verbatim legal corpus — the consolidated GDPR from EUR-Lex (Estonian and English) plus seven Estonian acts fetched from Riigi Teataja: IKS, AvTS, KOKS, SHS, RRS, PGS and AHS — the data-protection law, the public-information law, and the special acts a public-sector DPO meets daily.
- Act + § citations — every legal claim cites the act and provision it rests on, so the officer can verify the quote at the source in seconds.
- Jurisdiction-aware — each instance carries a jurisdiction; Ludwig works from EU law plus that country's national acts, and flags anything fetched from another jurisdiction as reference-only.
- Built for the AvTS ↔ GDPR tension — the duty to disclose public information versus the duty to protect personal data, the most common stumbling point in Estonian public-sector practice, municipalities in particular.
- Kept current — the corpus is re-fetched from the official sources (Riigi Teataja, EUR-Lex) and re-seeded as part of the release process, so amended acts are picked up without manual work on your side.
Coverage today is GDPR + Estonia; the first deployment target is Estonian organisations and municipalities. Instances in other EU countries get GDPR-grounded answers with an explicit note that their national-law pack is not loaded yet — further jurisdictions ship as licensable content packs, with no platform changes required.
Requires Ludwig (and through it, AI Assistant); same three provider modes, including fully self-hosted for deployments where no prompt leaves the network. The corpus is a reference library for Ludwig only — it is not an activatable compliance framework and never appears in the standards catalogue. And the caveat stated plainly: this is a research aid for a human data protection officer, not legal advice.